Power of Meat | Consumer perspectives on animal welfare
According to Power of Meat data, only 43% of shoppers think animal welfare for livestock in the U.S. is sufficient.
Nevil Speer, BEEF Magazine
Jul 30, 2020
The annual Power of Meat 2020 study provides a comprehensive look into various trends driving consumer behavior and perspectives. Accordingly, it’s subtitled, “An in-depth look at meat through the shopper’s eyes.” The report is published by FMI (The Food Industry Association) and the Foundation for Meat & Poultry Research & Education, prepared by 210 Analytics LLC and primarily sponsored by Cryovac (a division of Sealed Air)
There are many important take-aways out of the study; Industry At A Glance has highlighted several of those in recent weeks, including:
1. Basic trends in terms of what’s important to shoppers. Most notably, the brand/consumer relationship is becoming more important with time.
2. The importance of transparency with a majority of shoppers desiring more information about how/where livestock were raised and processed. Fifty-five percent of consumers believe meat and poultry brands should provide that information; meanwhile, 68% believe it’s important for grocery stores to do so.
3. Response to the statement: “Ranchers take measures to minimize impact of animal farming on environment.” Most significant are responses broken out by category:
· Gender: Men were much more likely than women to respond favorably (47 vs 35%, respectively)
· Age: The favorable response was fairly consistent across all age groups. However, the negative response rate consistently rises with each step down in age group. The net outcome being Gen Z (18-23 years old) respondents were twice as likely to disagree with the statement versus Boomers (56-75 years of age): 34 vs 17%, respectively.
That brings us to this week’s illustration. It features consumer response to the question of whether or not animal welfare for livestock in the U.S. is sufficient. Overall, 43% of shoppers agree with that assessment – down 8% from the 2019 study.
Meanwhile, much like the environmental assessment, the categorical responses are especially important. Once again, men were more likely to respond “yes” compared with women...
more, including links, chart