New bill in California would ban feeding food byproducts to livestock

One of the best things about cattle — that they are upcyclers! AB 2959 in California would rather see these feedstuffs end up in landfills.


Amanda Radke, BEEF Magazine  

Jul 26, 2020


In the many conversations surrounding climate change, it seems like cattle take the brunt of the criticism. The “cow farts” myth has permeated every corner of popular culture, and it’s a tough one to buck.


Yet the reality is, and we’ve discussed it many times on the BEEF Daily blog in the last decade, we know three things about cattle that are absolutely true:


1.    Calorie for calorie, it’s hard to beat the complete super food of nutrient-dense beef. Packed with 10 essential nutrients, including zinc, iron, protein and brain-fueling saturated fats, beef not only tastes good, it’s good for you, too.

2.    We use cattle nose-to-tail. Beef cattle provide more than 100 life-enriching byproducts.

3.    With proper grazing management, cattle can upcycle inedible cellulosic material like grass, hay, corn stalks, potato skins, cottonseed hulls, beet pulp and other residuals of crop farming. They convert these feedstuffs into that nutrient-dense beef and life-enriching by-products.


Now, what happens when we can no longer utilize these feedstuffs by incorporating them into healthy rations for cattle?


These feedstuffs end up in landfills. What a tragic waste.


And if some Californians have their way, that’s exactly what the future of the beef industry and the planet holds.


According to Todd Fitchette for Western Farm Press, “Farms that use agricultural byproducts for animal feed, bedding materials, and dust control may lose those through a bill now in the California Senate.


“Assembly Bill 2959 will force the unfranchised hauling of organic byproducts from grocery stores, restaurants, breweries, and wineries to be subjected to the same franchise agreements municipalities now have with select companies. Some fear the bill will go further as unintended consequences are realized,” Fitchette writes.


“Frank Konyn owns a dairy near Escondido, Calif., and uses the feed byproducts from local companies to feed his cows. If approved, the proposed law would ban him from hauling those byproducts to his farm.


“Under current practices, livestock producers pay a nominal fee to haulers to have organic byproducts delivered. These products tend to be less expensive than other feed sources while providing proper nutrition for livestock.”


Frank Mitloehner, air quality specialist at UC-Davis, provides us with some talking points on Twitter that this change on how California handles food waste, “could have devastating impacts on the animal agricultural industry.”


He explains, “Current California law states that local government agencies have the authority to decide whether the handling of solid waste is subject to a franchise municipality agreement. But there’s an exception: BYPRODUCTS from food and beverage processing.


“SB 1383...


more, including links