Is a new age dawning
for agricutlure?
Submitted by Howard Owens on November 9, 2008 - 7:32pm in agriculture
The Batavian
Mark T. Mitchell, writing for First Principles Journal,
discusses sustainable farming in an article "The Rediscovery of
Agriculture?"
Is there any farm in
Although he sells beef, chickens,
eggs, turkeys, pork, and rabbits, Salatin calls
himself a grass farmer. That is, he is in the business of raising meat and eggs
for sale, but he realizes that the quality of his products, and ultimately the
success of his farm, depends on the quality of the grass in his pastures.
Unlike the vast majority of meat products in the
Salatin
has developed innovated methods of enhancing his grass farm and thereby
providing a good place for his animals. For example, his cows are moved to new
pasture almost daily, and these docile beasts are anxious to move, for each
fresh pasture represents, in the cow’s mind, what Salatin
calls “cow ice-cream.” As in nature, once the herbivores (in this instance,
cows) have moved to another field, the birds (in this case, chickens) come
next. Portable chicken coops make it possible to move the chickens through a
recently grazed pasture. The chickens flourish on the cropped grass, and they
pick through the cow dung, eating bugs and parasites, and in the process spread
the manure over the field, while depositing plenty of their own. The symbiosis
of this relationship between cows and chickens replenishes the pastures even as
it sustains the animals living there. This is just one example of how the
people at Polyface seek to work with the natural world to raise healthy animals while
simultaneously sustaining and even improving the land on which they farm.
Mitchell then goes on to talk about the work of economist
John E. Ikerd, professor emeritus of agricultural
economics at the
Ikerd
admits that his views are not typical of economists, but
[B]eing an economist is no excuse for ignoring ecological and social reality. How can agriculture meet the food and fiber needs of a growing world population if we destroy the natural productivity and regenerative capacity of the land? Economists generally assume that we will find substitutes for anything we use up and will fix any ecological or social problems we create, but these are simply beliefs with no logical, scientific support in fact.
Furthermore, although it is true
that, at least in the short term, industrial agriculture can produce an
incredible amount of food, there are trade-offs, and we are remiss to ignore
what is inevitably sacrificed.
What is the net benefit of an agriculture that meets the physical needs of people but separates families, destroys communities, and diminishes the overall quality of life within society? How can it possibly be good to defile the earth, even if it is profitable to do so? Economists simply don’t consider the social, psychological, or ethical consequences of the things people do to make money. Economics treats such things as social or ecological externalities, which may impose irrational limits or constraints on the legitimate pursuit of wealth.
Mitchell then lists three reasons why centralized farming is
bad for the nation.
·
Industrialized food doesn't taste as good and
isn't as healthy;
·
Centralized agriculture is less secure against
terrorist attacks;
·
Industrial farming is not sustainable.
This is an agricultural community. I would be interested in two reactions to
Mitchell's piece -- is it realistic based on what you know about local farming,
and are there any farms in Genesee County implementing sustainable agricultural
tactics?
thebatavian.com