Voluntary food safety
regulations may prevent unwanted control
By Ron Smith
Farm Press Editorial Staff
Oct 28, 2008 10:00 AM
Segments of the
Those voluntary regulations also serve as marketing
advantages, according to a panel of experts who discussed food safety issues
recently during the Texas Produce Convention in
“Our members use certification markers, based on scientific
standards,” said Scott Horsfall, CEO, California
Leafy Green Marketing Agreement,
Participation in the agreement is voluntary but the
organization does have teeth. “Membership requires corrective action on any
non-compliance,” Horsfall said.
The organization was created following the 2006 spinach
contamination, which cost the industry $150 million. “The market agreement put
into place an organization that enforces food safety standards,” he said. It
also includes good agricultural practices (GAP).
Participation requires a lot of documentation, including a
list of growers and production plans. Horsfall said
other commodities are looking at the LGMA model.
Robert Sorenson, Sysco Foods,
The company’s commitment includes field and facility
inspection and traceability.
“With (recent) food safety concerns we drafted a new
program,” Sorenson said. That program includes GAP and third party audits,
especially for “at risk” crops such as lettuce, spinach, berries and cucurbits.
A database allows for monitoring and documentation of compliance and a list of
approved suppliers.
“If we wait, government regulations will give us something
we don’t want,” Sorenson said. “An ounce of prevention is still worth a pound
of cure.”
Chris Dzuik,
Training is available for vendors, from small farms to large
corporations. “The vendors train employees and they implement practices on the
farms.”
He said traceability is a key to improving food safety.
“It’s also a marketing advantage.”
Catherine Enright, Western Growers
Association,
southwestfarmpress.com