Becoming a Meat-Eater
in
Laura Anderson
A Temporary Omnivore in
The New York Times
July 22, 2008
This post is from
Laura Anderson, a senior at
According to a pamphlet my university gave me before I left
for my junior year in Paris, many normally self-restrained students engage in
uncharacteristic sensation-seeking behavior while studying abroad—drugs,
alcohol, cigarettes, unprotected sex. At the time, I told myself it wouldn’t
happen to me.
I was wrong. My out-of-character conduct?
I started eating meat.
It wasn’t difficult:
It wasn’t necessity that drove me to meat: I got by pretty
well for nine months on bread and cheese and pastry. As the year rolled along,
though,
I had been on vegetarian autopilot for quite some time - I was eight when I first forsook meat. Now, at 21, I no longer really understood my own reasons for being vegetarian, except in an abstract way. More importantly, I no longer really understood the omnivorous majority, and I thought it was time for a check-in.
Why, I wondered, are most people so attached to meat that
they cannot conceive of giving it up?
Also, I love food. I would have regretted spending a year in
So I’m eating some meat now. Temporarily.
Just until I go home at the end of the month.
In an effort to retain a little of my own dignity, not to
mention that of the animals that are dying for my selfish cause, I haven’t gone
completely wild. I try to eat high-quality, preferably organic meat. I don’t
eat it every day, let alone at every meal. The way I eat now is probably pretty
close to what a regular omnivore would call “flexitarian.”
But, as Mark noted in “The Minimalist” a couple of weeks ago, it can be harder
to eat some meat than no meat, even when you’re coming at it from the meatless end
of the spectrum.
At first, it was difficult to eat flesh without
masochistically dwelling on the lives of the animals on my plate. It took quite
a few glasses of wine to get those first bites of swordfish (the first animal I
ate) to go down easily.
But the transition from compunction to complacence came
surprisingly quickly. Recently I ate my first hamburger, and though vague
visions of wet-nosed cows flitted around my head, I couldn’t really muster the
disgust I felt only a month ago.
This doesn’t mean I’ve found meat irresistible. It tastes
good, all right, and the effortless protein is nice, but I still sometimes feel
that I’m being left out of a joke that everyone else gets. “Isn’t this
fantastic?” people will ask as they watch me take my first bite of bacon, or
steak, or boudin noir. I’ll nod politely, but the
flavor of meat doesn’t really justify the death of an animal for me.
I haven’t lost my other qualms about meat-eating, either. I
had just discovered how delicious sushi can be when I read Taras
Grescoe’s op-ed for the Times about the negative
environmental effects of salmon farming. Sure, there are bad consequences of
plant-based foods, too, but to me meat is just a lose-lose
situation—either the moral implications or the environmental effects are
unjustifiable.
I can’t deny, though, that I’m enjoying certain aspects of
my little personal experiment. Meat-eating facilitates a sense of connection
with other people that tempeh just doesn’t. Taking
the life of an animal for food is a morbid, ironic affirmation that we are
alive. It is also an affirmation our connection with those that came before us,
and there is great comfort to be had in eating meals that have been made the
same way for generations.
Still, I prefer the comfort of a clear conscience to the
comfort of tradition. I don’t regret my phase as a temporary omnivore, but I
think it’ll be a relief to go vegetarian again, this time fully aware of what
I’m giving up. I’ve looked at meat from both sides now, and I think I’ve come
out of it with a little more compassion—for people, not just animals.
bitten.blogs.nytimes.com
It’s okay to eat meat
Laura, you’re a carnivore: www.powerofmeat.com