Articles in this document:
·
Seeking
Solutions to Loss of CRP Grazing
·
RMFU News
Release: President Peppler issues statement on Conservation Reserve Program
suit
Seeking Solutions to
Loss of CRP Grazing
TheCattleSite News Desk
July 15, 2008
US – Cattle Producers in drought-stricken areas of the
In May, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) decided to
initiate the Critical Feed Use (CFU) program to help cattle farmers and
ranchers by allowing grazing and hay production on CRP land because of drought
and other natural disasters and because of the high costs of feed. The
plaintiffs in this case assert that USDA should have conducted an environmental
impact assessment before launching the Critical Feed Use program. A full
hearing on the matter is scheduled for July 17.
“If these groups are worried about an environmental impact
statement, they ought to look at the condition of the native range, which has
taken a beating, and this program was going to be the bridge to try to get us
down the road,” said R-CALF USA Member Gerald Schreiber, who ranches near
Woodrow, Colo. “Any piece of CRP I’ve ever used is improved over the long-term.
We’re not going to abuse the CRP land.
“This decision is a real slap,” he continued. “People have
been fencing. They’ve been anticipating this because hay is $150 a ton or more.
This will continue to cause damage to our native range because you no longer
have any options for moving your cattle. This decision affects your psyche. It
just wears on you. With corn as expensive as it is now, it’s a real quandary.”
thecattlesite.com
RMFU News Release:
President Peppler issues statement on Conservation Reserve Program suit
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union Statement on Preventing Release of CRP Lands
Source: RMFU
July 14, 2008
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union President Kent Peppler, a Mead,
Colo., farmer, issued a statement today on the temporary restraining order that
prevents the USDA from approving
Conservation Reserve Program contract amendments under the Critical Feed
Use plan. The order, issued by a
President Peppler's statement:
A rancher is not asking for Critical Feed Use waivers so he can exploit hay and grain prices; he’s got cattle to feed. This restraining order is very likely to bankrupt some ranchers. Family agriculture is not the enemy of environmentalists or conservation. The enemy of conservation is continuing drought conditions. Drought reduces a rancher’s access to native pastures for grazing and to alternative feed.
Farmers and ranchers are land stewards concerned with the long term benefit of their livestock and their land, including wildlife habitat. The CRP program is crafted to allow stewardship of the land without abusing the intent of the program. The Critical Feed Use waiver has been a part of CRP since 1985. If a rancher's CRP land is approved for grazing through a waiver, the rancher invests in making water available and putting up fencing to protect lands not affected by the waiver. Grazing and haying allowed via the Critical Feed Use plan provides other benefits to the environment by reducing the need for chemicals to control disease, weeds, and destructive pests.
The situation for beef production is dire. Drought conditions are requiring ranchers to liquidate herds at rates and levels that jeopardize their future as independent ranchers. Cutting them off from feed on their own lands is short-sighted. They are facing exactly the problem that Critical Feed Use waivers are meant to deal with. Expecting the government to respond to an emergency by doing an environmental impact study is not sensible.
It's a shame when family farmers and ranchers get caught in
the crossfire between conservationists and agri-business.
rmfu.org