NAFTA, TPP, China — Canada’s trade woes set to carry into 2018
The threat of U.S. protectionism is coupled with an ongoing search for new markets, part of a trade landscape of troubles and opportunities for Canada.
By Alex Ballingall, The Toronto Star
Dec. 27, 2017
OTTAWA—When Claire Citeau looks at Canada’s international trade situation, with NAFTA under threat amidst an ongoing search for new markets, she worries about another South Korea.
Canada struck a trade deal with the Asian country in 2015, but not before the European Union, Australia and the United States inked their own pacts to get rid of tariffs on a plethora of goods entering its $1.8-trillion economy.
The result, according to Citeau, who is executive director of the Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance, was that Canada essentially missed the boat. Exports of Canadian agri-food exports to South Korea slumped from more than $1 billion to $530 million after the E.U. and U.S. deals were signed. By the time Canada cemented its own deal, other countries had already rushed in to sell beef, pork, grains and other goods to South Korea, Citeau said.
“Our competitors in that market basically ate our lunch,” Citeau told the Star, citing what happened as a cautionary tale for the federal government trying to open up new lanes of trade as trade with the U.S. remains under the shadow of President Donald Trump’s protectionism.
“Today, what matters is not only the free trade agreements that we negotiate, but it’s the timeliness of negotiation and implementation (of) the agreements that our competitors are also after,” Citeau said.
If that’s the lesson from the South Korean deal, then it’s fair to say that Canada’s Liberal government is under pressure to clinch new trade agreements — and soon. Our biggest trading partner, the U.S., is led by a president who has repeatedly threatened to bury the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). At the same time, Ottawa’s search for new trading partners has led to a deal with the E.U., but reaped no results from exploratory talks to start negotiating an agreement with China or to finalize the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) that includes big markets such as Japan.
Citeau argued that, if the U.S. is turning inward, Canada could actually get a jump start on these new markets if it lands deals before other countries do — essentially the opposite of what happened with South Korea.
“Diversification is of paramount importance to Canada,” added Lawrence Herman, a trade consultant based in Toronto. “Crisis leads to opportunities, and Canada has to emerge from the likely NAFTA crisis by exploring new opportunities.”
Dan Ciuriak, a fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation, said we’ve been in this situation before. He rhymed off a cycle of scenarios dating back to the 1850s, when the colonies that became Canada started pushing for trade with the U.S. as avenues of exchange with Britain were clamped down.
“Every single generation of policymakers that was confronted with a trade shock, they did not turn inwards. They turned outwards,” he said.
That’s because Canada has never been large enough to pursue an isolationist policy, where domestic consumers can buy all the goods we produce and support the growth of robust industries without relying on exports.
“It’s a fundamental reality,” he said.
In the current situation, the government has said it is exploring trade with massive international markets like India, China and the 10 countries — besides Canada — that remain in the TPP talks after the U.S. pulled out under Donald Trump.
But last month, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was slammed in the international media when he didn’t show up to a late-night meeting on TPP during a summit in Vietnam. His office later blamed his tight schedule, but the deal — which would reduce tariffs and open up markets such as Japan, Malaysia and others — still hasn’t been finalized.
Then, in early December, Trudeau led a delegation to China under expectations that the launch of trade talks between Canada and the world’s second-largest economy were imminent. But no such talks emerged...